Toyota Supra Dimensions Across Generations Explored

Published

toyota supra dimensions - Kesimpulan
Table of Contents

The Toyota Supra has long stood as a benchmark in automotive engineering, where precision meets performance. Its evolution across the A80, A90, and GR Supra generations reflects not only mechanical advancements but also deliberate dimensional refinements that shape handling, aesthetics, and practicality. From the compact agility of the original model to the broader, more commanding stance of the modern iteration, every measurement tells a story of Toyota’s commitment to balancing road presence with driver engagement.

Understanding these dimensions is critical for enthusiasts, buyers, and engineers alike, as they directly influence everything from urban maneuverability to high-speed stability. This analysis dissects the technical specifications, design implications, and real-world applications of the Supra’s measurements, providing a comprehensive framework for evaluating its legacy and contemporary appeal.

Toyota Supra Generational Dimensions: Exterior and Interior Metrics

The Toyota Supra has undergone significant evolution across its three primary generations—A80 (1986–2002), A90 (2019–present), and GR Supra (2020–present)—each reflecting advancements in automotive engineering, performance tuning, and practicality. Exterior dimensions directly influence aerodynamics, handling, and market positioning, while interior dimensions determine passenger comfort and cargo utility. Below, the technical specifications are dissected to highlight how Toyota balanced performance and daily usability across generations, with a focus on measurable shifts in wheelbase, track width, and cabin space.

Exterior Dimensions: Length, Width, Height, and Wheelbase Across Generations

Exterior dimensions dictate the Supra’s visual presence, aerodynamic efficiency, and on-road behavior. The A80 prioritized lightweight construction and rear-wheel-drive purity, while the A90 and GR Supra incorporated wider tracks, lower centers of gravity, and refined aerodynamics to meet modern performance and safety standards.

A80 (1986–2002)

  • Length: 4,450 mm (175.2 in)
  • Width: 1,720 mm (67.7 in) (standard); 1,770 mm (69.7 in) for wide-body models (e.g., Supra Turbo)
  • Height: 1,285 mm (50.6 in)
  • Wheelbase: 2,450 mm (96.5 in)
  • Track Width (Front/Rear): 1,510 mm / 1,495 mm (59.4 in / 58.9 in)
  • A90 (2019–2020)

  • Length: 4,695 mm (184.8 in)
  • Width: 1,865 mm (73.4 in) (standard); 1,885 mm (74.2 in) for wide-body GR Supra
  • Height: 1,305 mm (51.4 in)
  • Wheelbase: 2,700 mm (106.3 in)
  • Track Width (Front/Rear): 1,620 mm / 1,610 mm (63.8 in / 63.4 in)
  • GR Supra (2020–present)

  • Length: 4,695 mm (184.8 in) (identical to A90)
  • Width: 1,885 mm (74.2 in) (standard, wider than A90 base)
  • Height: 1,295 mm (50.9 in) (lower than A90 due to stiffer suspension and revised underbody)
  • Wheelbase: 2,700 mm (106.3 in) (unchanged)
  • Track Width (Front/Rear): 1,630 mm / 1,620 mm (64.2 in / 63.8 in)
  • The A90’s 250 mm (9.8 in) wheelbase increase over the A80—combined with a 145 mm (5.7 in) wider track—improved stability at high speeds, while the GR Supra’s 10 mm (0.4 in) height reduction lowered the center of gravity by approximately 15 mm (0.6 in) compared to the A90, enhancing cornering grip and reducing body roll.

    Interior Dimensions: Passenger and Cargo Space for Daily Practicality

    Interior dimensions reflect Toyota’s approach to balancing performance with real-world usability. The A80’s compact cabin was optimized for driver engagement, while the A90 introduced modern ergonomics and expanded cargo capacity, catering to urban and long-distance driving.

    A80 (1986–2002)

  • Front Legroom: 1,050 mm (41.3 in)
  • Rear Legroom: 850 mm (33.5 in)
  • Front Headroom: 980 mm (38.6 in)
  • Rear Headroom: 950 mm (37.4 in)
  • Trunk Space (Lid Open):
  • Behind rear seats: 350 L (12.4 cu ft)
  • With seats folded: 800 L (28.3 cu ft)
  • Cargo Floor Length: 1,200 mm (47.2 in)
  • A90 (2019–2020)

  • Front Legroom: 1,070 mm (42.1 in)
  • Rear Legroom: 950 mm (37.4 in)
  • Front Headroom: 990 mm (39.0 in)
  • Rear Headroom: 980 mm (38.6 in)
  • Trunk Space (Lid Open):
  • Behind rear seats: 400 L (14.1 cu ft)
  • With seats folded: 1,000 L (35.3 cu ft)
  • Cargo Floor Length: 1,300 mm (51.2 in)
  • GR Supra (2020–present)

  • Front Legroom: 1,070 mm (42.1 in) (identical to A90)
  • Rear Legroom: 940 mm (37.0 in) (slightly reduced due to revised rear suspension geometry)
  • Front Headroom: 990 mm (39.0 in)
  • Rear Headroom: 970 mm (38.2 in)
  • Trunk Space (Lid Open):
  • Behind rear seats: 380 L (13.4 cu ft) (reduced by 20 L due to performance-focused packaging)
  • With seats folded: 950 L (33.6 cu ft)
  • Cargo Floor Length: 1,300 mm (51.2 in)
  • The A90’s 50 mm (2.0 in) increase in rear legroom over the A80 addressed a long-standing criticism of the original Supra’s cramped rear cabin, while the GR Supra’s minor reductions in rear space and trunk volume reflect its prioritization of performance over cargo flexibility.

    Generational Dimension Comparison Table

    The following table provides a side-by-side comparison of key exterior and interior metrics, emphasizing the trade-offs between performance and practicality across the Supra’s evolution.
    Metric A80 (1986–2002) A90 (2019–2020) GR Supra (2020–present) Change (A80→A90) Change (A90→GR Supra)
    Exterior Dimensions
    Length (mm / in) 4,450 / 175.2 4,695 / 184.8 4,695 / 184.8 +245 mm (+9.8 in) 0
    Width (mm / in) 1,720–1,770 / 67.7–69.7 1,865–1,885 / 73.4–74.2 1,885 / 74.2 +145–165 mm (+5.7–6.5 in) +20 mm (+0.8

    Design and Aesthetic Impact of Toyota Supra Dimensions

    The Toyota Supra’s dimensional evolution across generations reflects a deliberate balance between performance, driver engagement, and visual dynamism. Width, wheelbase, and track width are not merely structural parameters but defining elements of its aesthetic identity—shaping perceptions of aggression, refinement, and track capability. The Supra’s proportions have evolved from the angular, aerodynamic silhouette of the A80 to the broader, more muscular stance of the A90, with each adjustment reinforcing its role as a performance icon. These design choices extend beyond aesthetics, influencing aerodynamics, handling precision, and even passenger comfort, creating a cohesive narrative between form and function.

    The Supra’s dimensions contribute to its visual language, where every measurement—from the wheelbase stretch to the widened track—serves a dual purpose: enhancing on-track performance while reinforcing its presence on the road. The A90’s expansion in width and track width, for instance, accentuates its sportier silhouette, while the A80’s compact proportions prioritized agility. Below, the interplay between these metrics and their aesthetic consequences is dissected, alongside a technical breakdown of how Toyota optimized dimensions for the GR Supra’s performance ethos.

    Visual Proportions: Width, Wheelbase, and the Supra’s Stance

    The Supra’s width and wheelbase are primary determinants of its stance, dictating whether it appears aggressive, sleek, or compact yet muscular. A longer wheelbase (e.g., the A90’s 107.3-inch span compared to the A80’s 102.2 inches) elongates the Supra’s silhouette, creating a low, stretched-out profile that enhances stability at high speeds while subtly emphasizing its coupe heritage. Conversely, the A80’s shorter wheelbase contributed to its nimble, RWD-focused character, with a more centered weight distribution that improved rotation and responsiveness.

    Width plays an equally critical role in defining the Supra’s road presence. The A90’s 73.2-inch width (versus the A80’s 69.3 inches) expands its track width, particularly at the rear, which accentuates its track-ready posture. This broader footprint not only improves handling but also creates a wider, more imposing front end, with flared fenders and pronounced wheel arches that visually reinforce its performance pedigree. The A80, by comparison, retained a tighter, more understated width, aligning with its JDM aesthetic of restrained elegance.

    "A longer wheelbase elongates the Supra’s silhouette, while increased width broadens its track width—both contributing to a stance that balances aggression and aerodynamic efficiency."

    Height and Its Influence on Driver Visibility and Passenger Comfort

    The Supra’s height is a critical yet often overlooked dimension, directly impacting driver visibility, headroom, and rear-seat usability. While the A80 and A90 share similar overall heights (52.2 inches and 52.4 inches, respectively), subtle variations in roofline design and interior packaging create distinct ergonomic experiences. Below is a comparative analysis of how height affects key stakeholders:
    Dimension Impact on Driver Impact on Passenger
    Roofline Angle(A80: Steeper; A90: Flatter)
    • A80: Steeper roofline improves forward visibility, particularly at low speeds, aligning with its JDM focus on precision driving.
    • A90: Flatter roofline reduces wind noise at high speeds but may slightly obscure views of the hood and windshield pillars.
    • A80: Higher side windows (due to steeper angle) enhance rear visibility but limit headroom for taller passengers.
    • A90: Lower side windows improve headroom but may reduce rear-seat visibility, particularly in tight parking scenarios.
    Headroom(A80: 37.4 in; A90: 37.8 in)
    • Minimal difference, but the A90’s slightly higher headroom accommodates taller drivers without compromising sportiness.
    • Both models prioritize low seating positions, enhancing driver immersion but requiring careful adjustment for taller individuals.
    • A80: Tighter rear headroom (due to steeper roofline) may discomfort passengers over 6’0” without reclining seats.
    • A90: Improved rear headroom (1.4 inches more) but still limited by the coupe’s fixed roofline design.
    Windshield Angle(A90: More upright than A80)
    • A90’s upright windshield reduces glare at low sun angles, improving long-distance visibility.
    • A80’s sloped windshield offers a more traditional coupe aesthetic but may increase wind noise at highway speeds.
    • Upright windshields (A90) improve rear visibility through the windshield but may reduce the "sporty" coupe silhouette.
    "The Supra’s height is a compromise between aerodynamic efficiency and ergonomic practicality—prioritizing driver immersion while acknowledging limitations for rear-seat passengers."

    A90’s Wider Body and Track Width: Aerodynamics and Sportier Silhouette

    The transition from the A80 to the A90 introduced significant dimensional changes, particularly in width and track width, which were instrumental in achieving a more aggressive, track-focused aesthetic. The A90’s 73.2-inch width (up from 69.3 inches) and expanded track width (front: 63.0 inches; rear: 62.2 inches) created a broader, more muscular footprint, directly influencing aerodynamic features and visual dynamics.

    Key aerodynamic elements tied to these dimensions include:

  • Side Skirts: The A90’s wider body necessitated extended side skirts to manage airflow along the wheel arches, reducing turbulence and improving downforce. These skirts also visually lower the car’s stance, emphasizing its ground-hugging posture.
  • Rear Diffuser: The widened rear track allowed for a larger diffuser, enhancing exhaust flow and contributing to the car’s high-speed stability. The diffuser’s design is more pronounced in the A90, with vertical slats that disrupt airflow cleanly while adding to the car’s track-ready aesthetic.
  • Wheel Arch Flare: The A90’s flared fenders accommodate larger brake ducts and wheels, creating a three-dimensional visual effect that underscores its performance orientation. The A80’s more restrained flares, by contrast, aligned with its JDM preference for subtlety.
  • Front End Width: The A90’s broader front end supports wider intakes and headlights, improving cooling efficiency while reinforcing its global-market appeal. The A80’s narrower front end, while effective for its time, lacked the same level of aerodynamic sophistication.
  • "The A90’s dimensional expansion was not merely cosmetic—it enabled aerodynamic refinements that directly enhanced performance, from downforce generation to reduced drag."

    GR Supra’s Dimensional Adjustments: Balancing Performance and Road Presence

    Toyota’s development of the GR Supra required a strategic rethinking of dimensions to accommodate its high-performance chassis, track-focused tuning, and road-going practicality. Below is a step-by-step breakdown of how Toyota optimized dimensions for the GR Supra’s dual-purpose ethos:

    1. Wheelbase Optimization for Stiffness

  • The GR Supra retained the A90’s 107.3-inch wheelbase but reinforced the chassis structure with a multi-link

    Performance and Handling Implications of Toyota Supra Generational Dimensions

  • The Toyota Supra’s evolution across generations reflects deliberate engineering trade-offs between dimensional metrics and dynamic performance. Wheelbase, track width, and vehicle height are not merely cosmetic considerations but fundamental determinants of handling balance, stability, and aerodynamic efficiency. These parameters directly influence critical metrics such as yaw rate response, roll center positioning, and lateral load transfer, which collectively define the Supra’s behavior in transient maneuvers, high-speed stability, and cornering precision. Comparative analysis of suspension geometry across generations reveals how dimensional shifts—such as the A90’s widened track and optimized wheelbase—translate into measurable improvements in grip, understeer/oversteer tendencies, and aerodynamic downforce distribution.

    Wheelbase and Track Width: Impact on Yaw Rate and Steering Response

    The Supra’s wheelbase and track width are engineered to balance steering responsiveness and high-speed stability. A shorter wheelbase (e.g., the MK4’s 2,500mm vs. the A90’s 2,710mm) reduces understeer in mid-corner due to quicker yaw rate progression, but at the cost of reduced straight-line stability. Conversely, a longer wheelbase (as in the A90) improves neutral steering by increasing the roll center height differential between front and rear axles, mitigating body roll and enhancing weight transfer efficiency during aggressive inputs.

    The track width plays a critical role in lateral load transfer and tire grip distribution. The A90’s widened track (1,610mm front / 1,620mm rear vs. the MK4’s 1,500mm) reduces cornering forces per tire, lowering the risk of oversteer while improving peak grip through optimized contact patch pressure. This is quantified in lateral load transfer percentages: during hard braking (0.8g), the A90’s geometry reduces front-end lift by ~12% compared to the MK4, while under acceleration (0.9g), rear-end squat is mitigated by ~15% due to the widened stance.

    Suspension Geometry Evolution: Comparative Analysis of Handling Behavior

    The following table summarizes key suspension geometry changes across Supra generations, linking dimensional shifts to handling characteristics. Camber angles, caster offsets, and anti-sway bar tuning are critical in determining understeer/oversteer bias, while kingpin inclination influences steering feel and returnability.
    Parameter MK4 (1993–2002) A80 (2002–2009) A90 (2020–Present) Handling Impact
    Wheelbase (mm) 2,500 2,600 2,710 Longer wheelbase reduces understeer in high-speed corners but slightly delays steering response.
    Track Width (Front/Rear, mm) 1,500 / 1,500 1,530 / 1,540 1,610 / 1,620 Wider track improves lateral stability and reduces tire scrub, enhancing cornering grip.
    Front Camber (Static/Dynamic, °) -1.5 / -3.0 -2.0 / -3.5 -2.5 / -4.0 (adjustable) More negative camber increases contact patch but may induce oversteer if overcorrected.
    Rear Camber (Static/Dynamic, °) -1.0 / -2.5 -1.5 / -3.0 -2.0 / -3.5 (adjustable) Optimized rear camber in A90 reduces squat under acceleration, improving traction.
    Roll Center Height (Front/Rear, mm) 450 / 380 480 / 400 520 / 450 (adjustable) Higher roll center in A90 reduces body roll and improves weight transfer control.
    Anti-Sway Bar Tuning (Front/Rear) Medium / Soft Firm / Medium Adaptive (variable stiffness) A90’s adaptive bars optimize roll resistance based on driving mode, reducing understeer.

    Vehicle Height and Aerodynamic Optimization: Downforce vs. Drag Trade-offs

    The Supra’s center of gravity (CoG) height and bodywork profile significantly influence aerodynamic efficiency, particularly at high speeds. A lower CoG (e.g., the A90’s 1,320mm vs. the MK4’s 1,380mm) improves roll stability and reduces load transfer, but excessive lowering can compromise ground clearance and ride comfort. Conversely, a taller vehicle (e.g., the A80’s 1,350mm) sacrifices cornering stability but may offer better off-throttle grip due to reduced aerodynamic lift.

    The A90 addresses these trade-offs through active aerodynamics, employing the following engineering solutions to maximize downforce while minimizing drag:

    - Active Rear Wing (ARW):

  • Deployable at speeds above 100 km/h, generating ~300 kg of downforce at 200 km/h without significantly increasing drag.
  • Adaptive angle control reduces lift-induced oversteer by ~25% during hard braking from high speeds.
  • - Front Splitter and Diffuser:

  • Underbody diffuser channels airflow to create ~150 kg of downforce at 150 km/h, improving rear-end stability.
  • Active front splitter adjusts angle to optimize front-end grip under acceleration, reducing torque steer.
  • - Coanda Effect Utilization:

  • Smooth underbody panels and venturi tunnels enhance Coanda flow, increasing diffuser efficiency by ~18% compared to passive designs.
  • - Rear Spoiler Integration:

  • Fixed rear spoiler (non-deployable) generates ~100 kg of downforce at 120 km/h, primarily to mitigate rear lift during high-speed cornering.
  • The A90’s drag coefficient (Cd) of 0.26 (vs. the MK4’s 0.32) is achieved through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) optimization, with ~60% of downforce derived from underbody aerodynamics rather than traditional lift-generating surfaces. This approach ensures high-speed stability without compromising top-speed efficiency.

    Real-World Practicality and Market Positioning of Toyota Supra Dimensions

    The Toyota Supra’s generational shifts in exterior and interior dimensions reflect deliberate strategic choices to balance performance, driving dynamics, and urban adaptability. While competitors like the BMW M240i and Nissan Z prioritize different design philosophies, the Supra’s compact yet muscular silhouette positions it uniquely in the market. This section examines how dimensional metrics influence real-world usability, competitor comparisons, and the evolving preferences of driver demographics, particularly younger enthusiasts and performance-oriented buyers.

    The Supra’s dimensions are not merely technical specifications but critical determinants of its market appeal. Urban drivers favor compact cars for ease of navigation, while performance enthusiasts often tolerate reduced cargo space for track-focused handling. The Supra’s evolution—from the A80’s agile proportions to the A90’s more assertive stance—highlights Toyota’s response to shifting consumer priorities, particularly the demand for cars that excel in both city and spirited driving scenarios.

    Competitor Dimension Comparison and Market Differentiation

    The Supra’s dimensions set it apart from direct rivals in the performance coupe segment, influencing its positioning as a versatile yet sporty machine. Below is a comparative table of key models, illustrating how length, width, and cargo space shape market perception and practicality.
    Model Length (mm) Width (mm) Cargo Space (L) Market Positioning Focus
    Toyota Supra (A90, 2020–) 4,695 1,885 250 Balanced performance and urban agility; appeals to younger drivers and track enthusiasts
    Nissan Z (Z34, 2023–) 4,565 1,840 210 Lightweight, driver-focused; prioritizes handling over cargo capacity
    BMW M240i (G87, 2021–) 4,766 1,864 340 Luxury-oriented; longer wheelbase for rear-seat comfort, larger cargo space
    Toyota Supra (A80, 2019–2022) 4,530 1,845 250 Compact, garage-friendly; targeted urban performance buyers
    The Supra’s length (4,695 mm in the A90) positions it as slightly longer than the Nissan Z but shorter than the BMW M240i, striking a balance between sporty proportions and practicality. Its width (1,885 mm) is among the widest in its class, contributing to a commanding road presence and wider track for stability at high speeds. However, this width is offset by a cargo space of 250 liters, which, while modest, is competitive with the Nissan Z and significantly more efficient than the BMW’s larger but less performance-oriented design. The A80’s shorter length (4,530 mm) further emphasizes its urban suitability, making it easier to park and maneuver in tight spaces compared to its successor.

    Urban Maneuverability and Compact Design Advantages

    The Supra’s dimensions are optimized for city driving, addressing common pain points such as parking angles, turning radius, and garage compatibility. Toyota’s engineering prioritizes turning radius and parking space efficiency, ensuring the Supra remains agile despite its performance-oriented stance.

    Key metrics for urban adaptability include:

  • Turning radius: The A90’s turning radius is approximately 11.4 meters (10.9 meters for the A80), allowing it to navigate tight corners with ease. This is comparable to the Nissan Z (11.2 meters) but tighter than the BMW M240i (11.8 meters), which benefits from a longer wheelbase.
  • Parking angles: The Supra’s 180-degree rear overhang and 45-degree front overhang enable it to fit into standard parking spots without excessive protrusion. Toyota’s design minimizes the need for wide-angle parking maneuvers, a critical factor in congested urban environments.
  • Garage clearance: The A90’s 1,885 mm width is narrower than many luxury coupes (e.g., the BMW M240i at 1,864 mm but with a longer body) and fits within 2,400 mm-wide garages, a common standard in residential buildings. The A80’s 1,845 mm width further enhances garage compatibility.
  • The Supra’s wheelbase (2,700 mm in the A90, 2,650 mm in the A80) is shorter than the BMW’s (2,855 mm) but longer than the Nissan Z’s (2,600 mm), providing a sweet spot for rear-seat accessibility while maintaining a sporty driving posture. This configuration reduces the likelihood of rear-wheel strike during aggressive cornering, a common issue in wider, longer coupes.

    Generational Dimension Shifts and Demographic Appeal

    The transition from the A80 to the A90 reflects Toyota’s adaptation to evolving driver demographics, particularly the preferences of younger enthusiasts and performance-oriented buyers. The A80’s smaller dimensions (shorter length, narrower width) appealed to urban drivers seeking a garage-friendly, easy-to-park coupe, while the A90’s slightly larger footprint targeted a broader audience, including track enthusiasts who prioritize stability and presence over cargo space.
    The A80’s compact proportions resonated with younger drivers who valued practicality without sacrificing performance, while the A90’s more assertive stance catered to enthusiasts who sought a bolder, track-ready silhouette—even at the cost of reduced cargo capacity. Toyota’s dimensional adjustments demonstrate a shift from urban-centric design to a performance-first philosophy, aligning with the growing demand for cars that excel in both city and spirited driving.
    This generational evolution also addresses market segmentation:
  • A80 (2019–2022): Positioned as a budget-friendly, garage-accessible performance coupe, ideal for first-time buyers or those with limited parking.
  • A90 (2020–): Marketed as a premium, track-capable machine, appealing to buyers willing to compromise on cargo space for aerodynamic efficiency and road-holding authority.
  • Debunking Common Misconceptions About Supra Dimensions

    Several myths persist regarding the Supra’s dimensions, often stemming from misconceptions about its width, cargo space, or urban suitability. Below are frequently cited concerns, countered with measurable data and real-world comparisons.

    The Supra’s width is often criticized as impractical for garages, but:

  • Average residential garage width: Studies indicate that ~60% of U.S. single-family homes have garages 2,400 mm (8 ft) or wider, accommodating the A90’s 1,885 mm width with ~250 mm of clearance on each side.
  • Comparison to rivals: The BMW M240i (1,864 mm) and Nissan Z (1,840 mm) are similarly wide, yet neither is widely perceived as "too wide" for garages. The Supra’s longer wheelbase (2,700 mm vs. 2,600 mm for the Z) actually improves stability, offsetting any perceived bulk.
  • Cargo space limitations are another frequent critique, but:

  • 250-liter capacity is standard for performance coupes and aligns with the Nissan Z (210 L) and Chevrolet Corvette (285 L). The BMW M240i’s 340 L is an outlier, prioritizing luxury over sportiness.
  • Practical use cases: A large suitcase (60 L) and two duffel bags (40 L each) fit comfortably, while a weekend getaway requires folding seats (total 1,100 L), comparable to the

    The Toyota Supra’s dimensions are more than mere numbers—they are the foundation of its identity, blending heritage with innovation. Whether through the A80’s efficient compactness, the A90’s sportier proportions, or the GR Supra’s performance-optimized geometry, each generation demonstrates how thoughtful engineering transforms measurements into driving experiences. For drivers, these specifications dictate practicality and excitement; for competitors, they set benchmarks in the pursuit of perfection. As the Supra continues to evolve, its dimensions remain a testament to the enduring marriage of form, function, and performance.

  • FAQ

    What are the dimensions of the 2024 Toyota Supra?

    The 2024 Toyota Supra (GR Supra) measures 181.9 inches (4,620 mm) long, 72.4 inches (1,839 mm) wide, and 52.0 inches (1,321 mm) tall with a 106.7-inch (2,710 mm) wheelbase.

    What are the dimensions of the Toyota Supra MK4?

    The Toyota Supra MK4 (A80, 1993–2002) has dimensions of 179.1 inches (4,550 mm) long, 69.9 inches (1,775 mm) wide, and 51.6 inches (1,310 mm) tall, with a 98.4-inch (2,500 mm) wheelbase.

    What are the dimensions of the 2022 Toyota Supra?

    The 2022 Toyota Supra is 181.9 inches (4,620 mm) long, 72.4 inches (1,839 mm) wide, and 52.0 inches (1,321 mm) tall, with a 106.7-inch (2,710 mm) wheelbase, matching the 2023/2024 model.

    What engine does the Toyota Supra have?

    The Toyota Supra (GR Supra) uses a twin-turbocharged 2.4L inline-6 engine (2GR-FKS), producing 382–400 hp (varies by model year) and 369 lb-ft of torque.

    How much horsepower does the Toyota Supra have?

    The Toyota Supra (GR Supra) outputs 382 hp (standard) or 400 hp (Special Edition) in its base model, with a 369 lb-ft torque rating.

    What is the horsepower of the Toyota Supra?

    The Toyota Supra’s horsepower ranges from 382 hp (standard) to 400 hp (Special Edition), paired with 369 lb-ft of torque from its 2.4L twin-turbo inline-6 engine.

    toyota supra dimensions - Kesimpulan

    toyota supra dimensions - Kesimpulan

    Leave a Comment

    Comments are moderated before appearing. The data you submit is processed according to the Privacy Policy of viralcontentbee.com.