Mastering Market Research Vendor Selection and Implementation

Definition and Core Functions of Market Research Vendors

The role of market research vendors is foundational in transforming unstructured data into structured insights that align with business goals. Their expertise ensures that decision-makers receive not only accurate information but also contextually relevant interpretations, reducing the likelihood of misguided strategies. Vendors operate at the intersection of technology, analytics, and industry knowledge, offering services that span syndicated research, custom studies, competitive intelligence, and emerging trends like AI-driven predictive modeling.

Primary Role in Business Decision-Making

- Strategic Alignment: Vendors help businesses align their products, services, and marketing strategies with evolving consumer demands and industry trends. For example, a vendor might analyze shifting preferences in the electric vehicle (EV) market to advise an automaker on positioning and feature prioritization.

Key Insight:

Market research vendors act as "insight amplifiers," converting fragmented data into cohesive narratives that drive measurable business outcomes.

Structured Breakdown of Services Offered

1. Syndicated Research
   Pre-packaged studies conducted on a recurring basis (e.g., annually or quarterly) and sold to multiple clients across industries. These studies provide standardized benchmarks, such as consumer expenditure trends or industry-specific KPIs.
   • Examples: Nielsen’s consumer panel data, IBISWorld’s industry reports, or Statista’s market forecasts.
   • Advantages: Cost-effective, broad industry coverage, and rapid access to comparative data.
   • Limitations: Lack of customization; may not address niche or proprietary questions.
2. Custom Research
   Tailored studies designed to answer specific questions for a single client. These projects often involve bespoke methodologies, sampling, and analytical frameworks.
   • Examples: Competitive benchmarking for a startup entering a new market, or a brand perception study for a luxury retailer.
   • Advantages: Highly relevant to client objectives, flexible design, and actionable insights.
   • Limitations: Higher cost and longer turnaround times compared to syndicated research.
3. Competitive Intelligence
   Focuses on analyzing competitors’ strategies, market positioning, and performance to inform competitive advantage. This includes monitoring pricing, product launches, and customer feedback.
   • Examples: Tracking a competitor’s social media sentiment or reverse-engineering their marketing campaigns.
   • Methodologies: SWOT analysis, competitive benchmarking, and dark web monitoring for proprietary data leaks.
4. Emerging Trends and Futures Research
   Proactive analysis of disruptive trends (e.g., AI adoption, sustainability regulations) to prepare clients for future shifts.
   • Examples: Predicting the impact of carbon pricing on manufacturing supply chains or assessing the growth of blockchain in fintech.
   • Tools: Scenario planning, horizon scanning, and predictive analytics.
5. Data and Analytics Solutions
   End-to-end services encompassing data collection, cleaning, visualization, and advanced analytics (e.g., machine learning for segmentation).
   • Examples: Building a customer lifetime value (CLV) model for a subscription-based business or deploying NLP to analyze unstructured feedback.
   • Technologies: Python/R for statistical modeling, Tableau/Power BI for dashboards, and cloud-based data lakes.

Comparison: Syndicated vs. Custom Research

Syndicated research excels in scalability and cost-efficiency, while custom research delivers precision and strategic relevance—often serving as a complement rather than a substitute.

Differences Between B2B and B2C Market Research Vendors

1. Industry Focus and Complexity
   • B2B Vendors:
     Specialize in sectors such as technology, healthcare, manufacturing, and financial services, where decision-making involves longer sales cycles, multiple stakeholders, and high-value transactions.
     • Example: A vendor analyzing the
       

       Vendor Selection Criteria and Evaluation Framework

       Selecting the right market research vendor is a strategic decision that directly impacts data accuracy, actionable insights, and return on investment. Businesses must evaluate vendors based on objective criteria that align with their research objectives, budget, and operational capabilities. A structured evaluation framework ensures transparency, mitigates risks, and fosters long-term partnerships. Below are the critical factors to assess, comparative insights into vendor types, and methodologies for validating data quality and alignment.
       

       Critical Factors for Vendor Selection

       Businesses should prioritize the following eight criteria when evaluating market research vendors to ensure alignment with project requirements and organizational goals.
       
       • Expertise and Specialization Vendors with domain-specific experience (e.g., healthcare, fintech, or consumer packaged goods) demonstrate deeper industry knowledge, refined methodologies, and tailored insights. For example, a vendor specializing in B2B SaaS will better understand key performance indicators like customer acquisition cost (CAC) and churn rates than a generalist firm.
         
       • Scalability and Flexibility The vendor’s ability to handle projects of varying scope—from small-scale qualitative studies to large-scale quantitative surveys—without compromising quality. Scalability also includes adaptability to emerging trends (e.g., AI-driven analytics, real-time data collection) and geographic expansion.
         
       • Data Quality and Methodology Rigor Assess the vendor’s commitment to robust data collection techniques, sample representativeness, and statistical validity. Vendors should provide evidence of adherence to industry standards (e.g., ISO 20252 for market research) and transparency in methodology documentation.
         
       • Pricing Transparency and Value Proposition Hidden costs (e.g., data licensing fees, additional analysis charges) can inflate budgets. Request detailed breakdowns of pricing models (fixed-price vs. hourly) and compare deliverables to ensure cost-effectiveness. For instance, a vendor offering "unlimited revisions" may justify premium pricing if it reduces client-side rework.
         
       • Technology and Innovation Advanced tools for data visualization (e.g., Tableau, Power BI), automation (e.g., survey deployment via Qualtrics or SurveyMonkey), and AI-driven insights (e.g., natural language processing for open-ended responses) enhance efficiency. Vendors leveraging proprietary platforms (e.g., Nielsen’s consumer panel data) may offer unique competitive advantages.
         
       • Client References and Case Studies Verifiable success stories, particularly from peers in the same industry, validate the vendor’s reliability. Case studies should include measurable outcomes (e.g., "Increased market share by 15% post-campaign adjustment") and client testimonials that highlight responsiveness and problem-solving.
         
       • Confidentiality and Security Compliance Vendors handling sensitive data (e.g., proprietary customer insights) must comply with regulations like GDPR, CCPA, or HIPAA. Certifications such as SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001 indicate adherence to data protection standards. Contracts should explicitly outline data ownership, storage, and destruction policies.
         
       • Client Support and Communication Proactive communication, dedicated account managers, and post-delivery support (e.g., data interpretation workshops) ensure seamless collaboration. Evaluate response times to inquiries and the vendor’s willingness to customize reporting formats (e.g., executive summaries vs. technical deep dives).

       Comparison of Vendor Types

       The choice between niche and generalist vendors depends on project complexity, budget, and strategic objectives. The following table outlines key differences, advantages, and ideal use cases.
       

       Vendor Type	Pros	Cons	Best For
       Niche Vendors	Deep industry expertise (e.g., pharma market research vendors understanding FDA regulations). Tailored methodologies and jargon-free insights for specific sectors. Higher trust and credibility with specialized clients (e.g., luxury brands working with vendors focused on high-net-worth consumers).	Limited scalability for cross-industry projects. Potentially higher costs due to specialized resources. Less flexibility in adapting to non-core research needs (e.g., a healthcare vendor handling a retail project).	Startups and enterprises with unique industry challenges (e.g., biotech firms requiring clinical trial insights). Regulated industries (e.g., financial services needing compliance-aligned research). Long-term strategic partnerships where domain knowledge is critical.
       Generalist Vendors	Broad methodological versatility (e.g., combining surveys, ethnography, and social listening). Cost-effective for multi-industry or exploratory projects. Access to diverse talent and global reach (e.g., vendors with offices in APAC, EMEA, and the Americas).	Surface-level insights without deep industry context. Risk of generic deliverables lacking strategic depth. Potential for misalignment with niche client needs (e.g., a generalist vendor underestimating cultural nuances in emerging markets).	Enterprises with diverse research needs across business units. Startups testing multiple hypotheses before committing to niche vendors. Projects requiring rapid deployment (e.g., ad-hoc competitor analysis).
       Hybrid/Vendor Consortia	Combines niche expertise with generalist flexibility (e.g., a consortium of healthcare and tech vendors). Access to shared resources (e.g., panel data, AI tools) without individual vendor constraints. Ideal for large-scale, multi-phase projects (e.g., global brand launches).	Complex coordination and potential communication silos. Higher management overhead for client-side teams. Variable pricing structures across consortium members.	Multinational corporations with decentralized research teams. Innovation-driven firms piloting new methodologies (e.g., combining VR focus groups with big data). Projects requiring cross-disciplinary insights (e.g., merging consumer behavior with economic forecasting).

       Evaluating Data Quality and Methodological Alignment

       Data quality is the cornerstone of actionable market research, and vendors must demonstrate rigor in collection, analysis, and reporting. The following steps outline how to assess a vendor’s data quality and ensure methodological alignment with business objectives.
       
       • Review Sample Reports and Case Studies Request past deliverables that mirror the scope of the proposed project. Key elements to evaluate include:
         • Sample Size and Representativeness: Ensure the sample aligns with target demographics (e.g., age, income, geographic distribution) and statistical significance thresholds (e.g., 95% confidence level with ±3% margin of error for surveys).
         • Methodology Documentation: Verify transparency in data collection (e.g., survey instruments, recruitment criteria for qualitative participants) and analysis techniques (e.g., factor analysis, conjoint modeling).
         • Visualization and Storytelling: Assess whether insights are presented clearly (e.g., avoiding "chart junk") and actionably (e.g., linking findings to business strategies).
       • Third-Party Certifications and Accreditation Industry-recognized certifications signal adherence to global standards:
         • ISO 20252:2019: Ensures market research processes meet international quality bench
           

           

           Methodologies and Tools Employed by Market Research Vendors

           Market research vendors leverage a diverse array of methodologies and tools to collect, analyze, and interpret data, ensuring accuracy, scalability, and actionable insights. The evolution from traditional techniques to modern, technology-driven approaches has enhanced the depth and granularity of research outputs, while panel-based systems and advanced analytics refine sample representativeness and predictive capabilities. Vendors integrate secondary data sources, ethical compliance frameworks, and automated workflows to streamline projects from briefing to final delivery, balancing cost-efficiency with methodological rigor.

           The selection of methodologies depends on research objectives, target audience, and budget constraints, with each approach offering distinct advantages and limitations. Below, a comparative analysis of traditional and modern data collection methods is presented, followed by an exploration of panel-based research, project workflows, secondary research integration, advanced analytics, and ethical compliance—key pillars of vendor operations.
           

           Comparison of Traditional and Modern Data Collection Methods

           Traditional data collection methods, such as telephone surveys, face-to-face interviews, and paper-based questionnaires, have long been staples of market research due to their direct human interaction and structured approach. However, modern techniques—including mobile-first surveys, behavioral tracking, and digital ethnography—address limitations in reach, response rates, and real-time data capture. Below, a comparative overview highlights the trade-offs between these approaches:
           

           Traditional Methods prioritize depth and control but suffer from high costs, slow execution, and sampling biases.
           Modern Methods excel in scalability, speed, and behavioral insights but introduce challenges in data validity and privacy compliance.

           1. Traditional Methods: Strengths and Limitations
              • Telephone Surveys
                • Pros: High response rates for older demographics, structured questioning, and real-time clarification.
                • Cons: Limited sample diversity (e.g., exclusion of non-landline users), high operational costs, and interviewer bias.
                • Example: Nielsen’s traditional omnibus surveys for syndicated data, relying on landline samples to ensure demographic balance.
              • Face-to-Face Interviews
                • Pros: Rich qualitative insights (e.g., body language, environmental context) and adaptability to complex topics.
                • Cons: Geographical constraints, high per-interview costs (~$200–$500), and interviewer influence on responses.
                • Example: In-depth interviews (IDIs) for B2B research, where vendors like Kantar conduct 60–90-minute sessions with C-level executives.
              • Paper-Based Surveys
                • Pros: Low-tech accessibility for offline or low-literacy populations; useful for longitudinal studies (e.g., diary methods).
                • Cons: Low response rates, sampling biases (e.g., urban vs. rural), and manual data entry errors.
                • Example: Diary studies in FMCG (Fast-Moving Consumer Goods) to track product usage patterns over weeks.
           2. Modern Methods: Strengths and Limitations
              • Mobile-First Surveys
                • Pros: Global reach (97% smartphone penetration in developed markets), real-time responses, and multimedia integration (e.g., video questions).
                • Cons: Fatigue from push notifications, underrepresentation of non-digital users (e.g., elderly), and technical barriers (e.g., app crashes).
                • Example: Qualtrics’ mobile-optimized panels achieving 60%+ completion rates for short surveys (<5 minutes).
              • Behavioral Tracking (Passive Data Collection)
                • Pros: Objective measurement of actions (e.g., clicks, dwell time) without respondent burden; ideal for digital customer journey analysis.
                • Cons: Privacy concerns (GDPR/CCPA compliance), lack of contextual intent, and reliance on opt-in consent.
                • Example: Google Analytics 4 (GA4) combined with survey tools to correlate online behavior with stated preferences.
                • Digital Ethnography
                  • Pros: Unobtrusive observation of natural behaviors (e.g., social media posts, app usage); useful for cultural insights.
                  • Cons: Ethical dilemmas (e.g., public vs. private data), high analysis costs, and potential for misinterpretation.
                  • Example: Vendors like TNS (now Kantar) using social listening tools to analyze unprompted brand mentions in real time.
              • Hybrid Approaches
                Vendors increasingly combine methods to mitigate individual limitations. For instance:
                • CAPI (Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing): Blends face-to-face interaction with digital tools to reduce errors and improve data capture.
                • Mixed-Mode Surveys: Deploy identical questions via phone, email, and mobile to maximize response rates while adjusting for modality biases.
                • Example: The Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel uses a hybrid model, inviting respondents via mail (traditional) but collecting responses digitally (modern).

           Panel-Based Research and Representative Sampling

           Panel-based research enables vendors to maintain a pre-recruited, diverse group of respondents for longitudinal or repeated cross-sectional studies. The effectiveness of panels hinges on recruitment strategies, sample balancing, and incentive structures, all designed to mirror target populations. Below, the mechanics of panel management and quality control are detailed:
           

           Representative panels require continuous monitoring of demographic, psychographic, and behavioral attributes to prevent skew over time.
           Vendor panels (e.g., consumer, B2B, or niche-specific) are curated using probabilistic or quota sampling, with refreshment rates of 20–30% annually to sustain validity.

           1. Panel Recruitment and Composition
              • Consumer Panels
                • Sources: Probability-based sampling (e.g., random digit dialing for phone panels) or opt-in registries (e.g., YouGov’s online panel).
                • Balancing: Adjusting for age, income, region, and digital literacy using statistical weighting (e.g., raking).
                • Example: Nielsen’s Consumer Panel tracks 60,000+ households globally, with refreshment via mail-in surveys to replace dropouts.
              • B2B Panels
                • Sources: CRM databases, industry directories, or vendor-specific networks (e.g., Clutch for SMEs).
                • Balancing: Stratification by firm size, sector, and decision-maker role (e.g., CMOs vs. CFOs).
                • Example: Gartner’s Peer Insights relies on a curated panel of 3M+ IT professionals, with invitations extended via LinkedIn and email.
              • Niche Panels
                • Sources: Specialized recruiters (e.g., patients for pharma research) or community-based groups (e.g., LGBTQ+ consumers).
                • Challenges: Small sample sizes requiring advanced statistical techniques (e.g., Bayesian inference) to generalize findings.
                • Example: 20|20 Research’s "Millennial Mom" panel, recruited via partnerships with parenting blogs and Facebook groups.
           2. Panel Maintenance and Quality Control
              • Refreshment and Attrition Management
                • Methods: Annual refreshment via new recruits or re-engagement of lapsed respondents (e.g., via loyalty points).
                • Thresholds: Panels with >30% annual attrition risk recalibration (e.g., adjusting incentives or communication frequency).
              • Response Validation
                • Techniques:
                  • Speeders: Flagging responses completed in <10% of average time.
                  • Straight-Lining: Detecting identical answers across questions.

                    Industry-Specific Applications and Case Studies in Market Research Vendor Strategies

                    Market research vendors adapt their methodologies, compliance frameworks, and analytical tools to address the distinct regulatory, operational, and consumer dynamics of specialized industries. Regulated sectors such as healthcare and finance impose strict data governance requirements, including anonymization, HIPAA/GDPR compliance, and third-party validation, which necessitate vendor solutions that integrate legal safeguards with actionable insights. Meanwhile, sectors like retail and manufacturing demand tailored approaches to challenges such as omnichannel consumer behavior, supply chain transparency, or R&D-driven innovation cycles. This section examines how vendors differentiate their offerings across industries, highlights case studies demonstrating niche-market success, and explores the limitations of generic solutions in highly specialized domains.
                    

                    Compliance and Data Restrictions in Regulated Industries

                    Regulated industries impose unique constraints on market research vendors, requiring adherence to sector-specific laws and ethical guidelines. In healthcare, vendors must navigate HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) and GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) by ensuring patient data anonymization, secure storage, and explicit consent protocols. For example, pharmaceutical market research often relies on syndicated panel data with built-in de-identification or qualitative interviews conducted by trained professionals to avoid bias. Similarly, financial services vendors must comply with SEC guidelines (e.g., fair disclosure rules) and Basel III risk assessments, limiting access to proprietary transactional data unless aggregated or anonymized.

                    Data restrictions extend to methodological adaptations, such as:
                    

                  • Healthcare: Use of passive data collection (e.g., EHR-derived insights) instead of active surveys to minimize patient burden.
                  • Finance: Blockchain-audited surveys for high-net-worth individuals to ensure transparency in wealth management studies.
                  • Agriculture/Food Safety: Third-party certified lab data integration to validate consumer perception studies on pesticide residues or organic claims.

                  Vendors mitigate risks by employing compliance-as-a-service (CaaS) frameworks, where legal teams pre-screen methodologies against regulatory benchmarks before deployment.
                  

                  Industry-Specific Vendor Solutions: Comparative Analysis

                  The following table contrasts vendor approaches across Retail, Tech, and Manufacturing, emphasizing sector-specific challenges and tailored solutions:
                  

                  Industry	Key Challenges	Vendor-Specific Solutions	Tools/Methodologies Employed
                  Retail	Omnichannel fragmentation (in-store vs. digital attribution). Dynamic pricing and promotional sensitivity. Supply chain disruptions (e.g., last-mile logistics).	Unified Commerce Analytics: Vendors like NielsenIQ and Kantar integrate POS, e-commerce, and loyalty program data to map customer journeys across touchpoints. AI-Driven Price Optimization: Tools like ProfitWell or Vendavo simulate price elasticity models using vendor-sourced competitor pricing data. Predictive Demand Sensing: IBM Watson Supply Chain leverages vendor-provided weather, social media, and inventory data to forecast disruptions.	NielsenIQ’s Total Retail Index: Tracks cross-channel sales trends. Kantar’s ShopperScape: Combines in-store behavior with digital footprints. Tableau + Alteryx: Custom dashboards for real-time promotion ROI analysis.
                  Tech	Rapid product obsolescence (e.g., hardware/software cycles). Developer vs. end-user feedback misalignment. Ethical AI bias in recommendation engines.	Dual-Stakeholder Research: Vendors like Forrester or Gartner conduct parallel studies with tech buyers (B2B) and consumers (B2C) to align roadmaps. Agile Validation: Tools like UserTesting integrate with Jira/Slack for real-time feedback loops during sprints. Bias Audits: Partnerships with Fairness.com or Aequitas to test algorithmic fairness in vendor-provided datasets.	Forrester’s Tech Tide: Predictive models for emerging tech adoption. Appcues + Hotjar: Heatmaps for UX validation in SaaS products. TensorFlow Decision Forests: Open-source bias detection in vendor datasets.
                  Manufacturing	Long R&D cycles (e.g., automotive, aerospace). Supplier ecosystem transparency. Sustainability reporting pressures (e.g., Scope 3 emissions).	Closed-Loop Innovation: Vendors like IHS Markit or Deloitte’s AI Factory simulate product lifecycles using digital twins to test consumer acceptance before prototyping. Supplier Sentiment Analysis: NLP tools (e.g., Lexalytics) parse vendor-sourced contract terms to identify risk factors. Circular Economy Modeling: Partnerships with EcoVadis to integrate vendor data into ESG compliance dashboards.	PTC ThingWorx: Digital twin platforms for concept testing. SAP Ariba: Supplier risk scoring integrated with vendor surveys. Siemens MindSphere: IoT data for predictive maintenance insights.

                  Case Study: Vendor Success in Niche Markets

                  Project: Luxury Goods Market Expansion for a Swiss Watchmaker Vendor: McKinsey & Company (in collaboration with Kantar Worldpanel)
                  Methodology:
                  
                  • Phase 1: Micro-Trend Identification
                  • Analyzed Kantar’s Luxury Attitudes Survey (2022–2023) to segment high-net-worth individuals (HNWI) by digital vs. traditional luxury preferences.
                  • Deployed passive tracking via Apple Pay transaction data (anonymized) to map spending patterns in Gen Z vs. Baby Boomer cohorts.
                  • Phase 2: Concept Testing with Bespoke Panels
                  • Recruited 500 HNWI via Luxury Institute’s closed-panel network, using disguised choice experiments to test watch designs without brand bias.
                  • Integrated eye-tracking (via Tobii Pro) during virtual showroom sessions to measure subconscious appeal.
                  • Phase 3: Launch Optimization
                  • Simulated omnichannel retail scenarios using Kantar’s ShopperVista to optimize in-store vs. e-commerce allocation.
                  • Partnered with McKinsey’s AI team to deploy a reinforcement learning model predicting optimal pricing tiers by region.

                  Outcomes:

                  32% increase in pre-launch reservations compared to historical averages, driven by personalized digital configurators tailored to regional tastes (e.g., rose gold dominance in Asia vs. classic gold in Europe).

                  Reduction in overstock risk by 28% through dynamic inventory allocation, validated via vendor-provided sales forecasting tools.

                  First-year revenue growth of 45% in target markets, with Kantar’s post-launch NPS tracking confirming a 68-point increase in brand loyalty among HNWI.

                  Key Adaptations:
                  
                  • Data Privacy: All HNWI interactions were conducted via encrypted, vendor-managed portals with two-factor authentication.
                  • Cultural Nuance: Localized surveys were translated by native linguists and back-checked using Kantar’s Cultural Insights Framework

                    Selecting the right market research vendor is a strategic investment that directly impacts a business’s ability to innovate, compete, and grow. By evaluating expertise, methodological alignment, and technological capabilities, organizations can mitigate risks and unlock insights that drive measurable outcomes. From regulated industries like healthcare to dynamic sectors such as fintech, vendors play a pivotal role in shaping data-driven strategies that resonate with target audiences. As methodologies evolve—with AI, behavioral tracking, and ethical compliance becoming non-negotiables—the partnership between businesses and research vendors must prioritize collaboration, transparency, and adaptability to stay ahead in an increasingly data-centric landscape.

                  FAQ

                  What are some top market research vendors globally?

                  Leading market research vendors include Nielsen, Ipsos, Kantar, GfK, and Forrester. These firms provide data on consumer behavior, market trends, and industry insights across sectors. Smaller or niche players like Statista, Mintel, and NielsenIQ also serve specific regional or industry needs.

                  What is WOW in the context of market research vendors?

                  WOW typically refers to "World of Work" or "Workforce Optimization" in market research, often linked to vendors like Gallup, Mercer, or Oxford Economics. These firms analyze workplace trends, employee engagement, and HR-related metrics for businesses.

                  Which are the best market research companies worldwide?

                  The best global market research companies are Nielsen (consumer insights), Ipsos (public opinion), Kantar (media and retail), and GfK (consumer tracking). Regional leaders like McKinsey (strategy) and Deloitte (consulting) also offer specialized research services.

                  Which market research companies operate in Pune, India?

                  Pune hosts firms like Nielsen India, Ipsos Connect, and local agencies like Marketics and TMR Research. These companies cater to B2B, B2C, and niche industries like pharma and IT. Many global vendors have Indian subsidiaries based in Pune.

                  What are the leading market research companies in India?

                  Top Indian market research firms include NielsenIQ, Kantar India, and Ipsos India, alongside local players like TMR Research, Marketics, and ORG-MARG. These companies serve sectors like retail, healthcare, and technology with customized data solutions.

                  Which market research companies are based in Bangalore?

                  Bangalore is home to firms like NielsenIQ, Ipsos Connect, and local agencies such as TMR Research and Marketics. Tech-focused vendors like Gartner and Forrester also have offices there, serving IT, telecom, and startups. Many global brands operate regional hubs in the city.

                  • business intelligence
                  • competitive-strategy
                  • data analytics
                  • market research
                  • vendor selection

                  Leave a Comment

                  Name

                  Comment

                  Post Comment

                  Comments are moderated before appearing. The data you submit is processed according to the Privacy Policy of viralcontentbee.com.